New Approach for TrueFi TVL Growth and Risk Management

[Suvicrypto]

I want to add that since there are two competing proposals currently in TFIP-24 and TFIP-25, its worth checking also the value versus TVL they bring for the DAO’s potential expenses.

While upfront costs for Type3 is better, with only a bit over 1 million TVL, the costs become about the same between the two.

Looking at expenses provided by Cicada, despite having no TVL growth, and three borrowers, there’s been costs for 3-4 full time headcount, which would make very little sense in terms of cost-benefit.

Current Vault Maturities are follows:
Gravity Team (1 of 2 vaults): Jun 4, 2025
Wincent: Jun 25, 2025
Wincent Investment Fund: Jul 2, 2025
Fasanara: Aug 21, 2025
Gravity Team (2 of 2 Vaults): Feb 5, 2026

With little TVL traction among these, two of three borrowers and TVL (of sooooo little there is) will lapse in 3 months. So how much “management” is there to be done?

Links to Proposals:

[TFIP-24]: Proposal to Appoint Type3 as TrueFi Credit Risk Advisor

Dear TrueFi Community Please accept our apologies for the procedural error in first posting to tally before snapshot. We wish for our TFIP-25 tally proposal to be cancelled and will submit again under the correct title of [TFIP-24] once snapshot voting has ended. Best regards, Type3 Team

[TFIP-26] RWA Activity Updates & Renewal Proposal

One year, and over 1 million dollars of fees to Cicada and the result today is a few vaults with almost no money. How can you justify such continuation of fees where the fees are higher than the TVL in all the vaults you say you opened? For the community, since you started working with Truefi, how much revenue has Truefi earned from the vaults and also confirm the total costs to Truefi you have charged?