# Poll: Proposal for Reducing TRU Emission Rate

**URL:** <https://forum.truefi.io/t/poll-proposal-for-reducing-tru-emission-rate/62>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [November 25, 2020, 5:58am UTC](https://forum.truefi.io/t/poll-proposal-for-reducing-tru-emission-rate/62 "2020-11-25T05:58:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rafaelcosman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.truefi.io/rafaelcosman/32/4_2.png) [@rafaelcosman](https://forum.truefi.io/u/rafaelcosman)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2020, 3:34pm UTC](https://forum.truefi.io/t/poll-proposal-for-reducing-tru-emission-rate/62/3 "2020-11-25T15:34:29Z")

</div>

**Hey Kenny, if the community votes in favor of the company never farming (even though for the first 6 months the company is burning or contributing back all farmed tokens) I’m OK with that.** But I believe that right now the company being able to make adjustments in response to community feedback is of great benefit to the ecosystem.

Take last night: I believe there was widespread agreement in the community that yesterday too many TRU tokens were coming onto the market and this was hurting the ecosystem (see [this poll](https://forum.truefi.io/t/investors-forgotten-via-token-economics/48/3)). The company could quickly respond by increasing its own farming (while actual protocol changes take longer) and I believe this is the reason last night went better than it otherwise might have.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.truefi.io/t/poll-proposal-for-reducing-tru-emission-rate/62)._