Refuting Governance Attack Allegations: Teragon's Defense

As previously stated in an earlier response:

Our proposal’s scope is focused on technical integration and product development, not on business development or finding managers. This has been clearly communicated multiple times on this forum.

This simply not true. All of our deployed contracts and their verified codebase are available on explorers and links to them in our docs. Our deployed contracts are Managed Vaults and Structured Products. These codebases are used to implement different kinds of instruments and strategies, as highlighted in our proposal (Managed vaults, Structured Vaults and Index vaults)

The verified codebases of our Options contracts are deployed on the Fuji testnet: https://testnet.snowscan.xyz/address/0xaf56464ddbee68d49f976aef4ecce17495de3ef6#code
Please see more in the docs.

I understand that @nezouse and @MiksuJak, as Wallfacer employees, may have concerns about how our proposal might impact their situations.

However, I want to reiterate that Teragon’s intention is not to replace any existing teams or roles. Our goal is to complement and enhance TrueFi’s existing capabilities as proposed in our original 30-week plan.