Would be great if Wallfacer would be able to address this questions regarding the content of their proposal and how it relates to the current strategy of the DAO, specifically how the structure of funding proposal is connected to performance and in turn the currently contemplated strategy.
For consideration of the community, the previous funding proposal HERE contained clear task delineation with some light analysis to determine relative priority.
Is there a work stream breakdown that evaluates the performance of these tasks? I saw a general recap, but I did not see it compared against the prior framework Wallfacer opted to used.
Have we abandoned the project management framework? If not, is there a similar breakdown for this current funding proposal? Is that associated with deliverables or is there a resource breakdown for the funding arrangement?
In order to maintain the “D” in DAO, these management and funding frameworks need to be transparent to the extent possible. This enables us token holders to engage and collectively determine the path in an open forum, with the necessary information.
@ryan.rodenbaugh @WallfacerLabs @TheSkyHopper @michael.bland @ferengi @tylerw