Hello, TRUHOLDER. It is my honor to be able to participate in community governance with you here and in the TG group. I know you are aware that Truemarket has been discontinued, because in your post on May 9, ‘Request for Information on Canceled and Upcoming Projects’, I gave you a reply and a screenshot of the conversation record. But what if you didn’t ask or I didn’t answer you? Can you imagine that you knew the truth? Even in the roadmap and report, there was no news that Truemarket was discontinued. So I mentioned that all the reports we saw were perfect, but in such perfect reports, we could not see the promises and finished products being launched as scheduled, nor even explanations for the various delays.
You may have noticed that in fact, many Chinese KOLs recommended $TRU from December last year to January this year. Everyone knew that Truemarket would be launched according to the time point of the roadmap, so they all said that the price of $TRU would rise because there would be good news. At that time, many people still bought $TRU and were waiting. But what came out of the waiting was that the roadmap had changed, and there was no explanation for the situation of Truemarket. People started to get disappointed with Truefi, and you can see only a few people recommending or mentioning $TRU on X now.
Each time I mention Akemona, I feel annoying. Why do I always target Akemona? Maybe everyone thinks that it doesn’t matter how much money is given to Akemona. But if you pay attention to the situation on the chain, you may understand me. Every month Akemona receives a lot of $TRU and immediately transfers it to Coinbase Pro for sale. I personally think that it is difficult for the price of $TRU to rise, and the selling of partners is also related. Due to the lack of good news, there are already few investors buying $TRU in the market, coupled with a large number of sell-offs, resulting in us often seeing the price of $TRU dump harder, but hard to rebound.If Akemona brings us good achievements, I think these expenses are worth it, but in fact we haven’t seen anything from them. I never question Kelvin’s income, because I think Kelvin’s contribution to the team is reasonable.Fortunately, TrueFi has changed its strategy and no longer relies on a third party for construction. Otherwise, more $TRU would be sold on the market, and the same money would be given but no achievements would be seen.
You can click the following link to check the Akemona got and sold on the chain.
The guy you mentioned, “Who is the CEO of TrueFi?", maybe you think he is annoying, maybe you think he is fool. But if you understand why he asked this question, you may have a different thoughts. Sunny is also a TRU holder, and has held it for nearly 4 years. In these 4 years, he has been waiting for good news from the team and good projects to drive up the token price. Although he often complains about the price, he also knows that the price is determined by the market, and the market needs the team to announce good news. But the 4-year wait has made him disappointed with TrueFi.
In fact, who is the CEO means who is the leader of TrueFi. A good leader can lead the project to better development. Like Musk leading Tesla forward, like Jack Ma created a successful Alibaba. There seems to be no such leader on TrueFi, which is why some investors think you are the leader of TrueFi. To build a successful project, you can’t do without a leader’s decision-making and lead the team to work day and night. In my eyes, TrueFi not only does not have a real leader, but the team members are basically part-time, which may also explain why the project is always ineffective or always delayed. At the same time, I also asked a question in the post, how many team members and DAO members are Tru holders, if so, how many $TRU tokens do they hold? Of course, this is privacy and does not need to be answered, but I think if the team members are Tru holders, they should work harder to build and strive to launch good news to drive the price of the currency. If the team members are not only not Tru holders, it just explains why the team doesn’t care much about the progress of the project.A real Tru holder, like you, will always pay attention to the project progress, provide opinions, and recommend TrueFi on X. But many team members’ private Xs are recommending Bearchain. Of course, this is free, and we don’t know whether the construction of Bearchain will have any connection with TrueFi. If the construction of Bearchain can also increase the TVL of TrueFi, we are very supportive, and I will apologize for my stupid misunderstanding. But if Bearchain has nothing to do with TrueFi, I hope the team can give half of the construction focus to TrueFi. If the construction of TrueFi is as active as the construction of Bearchain, I believe TrueFi is now a successful project.