Thanks for the additional context @TheSkyHopper.
I have agreed with @TheSkyHopper that to reduce a potential conflict of interest and ensure a Chinese wall, both myself and @ferengi will solely take over any potential Teragon-TrueFi correspondents moving forward.
Once again, thank you for bringing this forward @Cicada.Partners. The poll created is resoundingly against the Tergaon Proposal going through in its current state.
We cannot have governance work in an unclear way, as this will repel potential bidders and service providers from voting within the DAO on important matters. Therefore, as @Sh4un mentioned each Cancellor should transparently express why they are denying the Proposal.
As of the latest proposal, the Cancellor role has been assigned to a multisig address that includes members from Archblock, Wallfacer, and long-time community members.
- TylerEther has initiated the Cancellor vote with an explanation.
- One other wallet has also done so, but without an explanation.
- It’s required that one more vote, from a community member or Archblock, so that we can revist the Teragon proposal with ample time to discuss its merits and how it may be integrated into the TrueFi vision.
