Very well articulated points from both @sebdavies and @Marcus_Leanos
The timing of this proposal is certainly interesting, especially considering the Board of Directors has just called for the formation of a fuller board. Yet, the community is being asked to evaluate a proposal (that is seemingly setting the DAO to a diverging direction) on a very short timeline, without the benefit of a detailed strategic plan and execution details for a material budget allocation.
Given a number of highly qualified candidates with a diverse background and execution track record have applied to the BoD roles, it seems perfectly logical to wait for a complete board, as a team the BoD can thoroughly review any proposal, and then present it to the community.
Governance relies on checks and balances, and pushing through a rushed proposal without adequate details sets a troubling precedent, even more so since this proposal is from the presiding 2-person BoD. @vandynathan specifically how would this be measured in decentralization matrix and transparency report you have proposed in your board candidate statement?
