Interesting, I don’t remember seeing that comment from Tyler. I like Tyler, so i do support his posts with simple fast likes from time to time.
That said, I still believe that referencing comments from others after the fact doesn’t substitute for properly disclosing information to the DAO regarding the transition from Orthogonal Credit before any proposal is made.
Let’s be honest and not undermine anyone’s intelligence here. If Orthogonal had a very successful past without any negatives, I’m sure the very first line in your proposal would have been something like this: “Attention! We have some great news, Orthogonal Credit has rebranded to Cicada Partners.”
Regarding the audio link you mentioned:
I didn’t listen to that specific audio,
I started this thread: All Things DeFi.
I typically just use relevant keywords to search on Spotify to gather relevant information for the DAO to make better informed decisions. In this case i simply searched “Cicada Partners” and simply posted the link.
I have nothing further do add to this discussion.
It’s time for the DAO to move forward and refocus on building with an in-house team, just as it did during TrueFi’s early days, when the protocol achieved its greatest success.
This time, we can continue to develop a well-rounded, solid DAO governance structure with a holistic, bottom-up approach, driven by a skilled internal team that prioritises TrueFi’s best interests—free from personal agendas or distractions tied to external company success or failures.